For Christmas I received an intriguing present from a buddy - my extremely own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was entirely composed by AI, with a couple of simple prompts about me supplied by my friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of composing, however it's likewise a bit repeated, and extremely verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet's prompts in collecting data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mysterious, repeated hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, because rotating from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who created it, can order any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone creating one in any person's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, created by AI, and developed "entirely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach worries that the item is intended as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get sold further.

He wants to expand his variety, creating various categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps offering an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - offering AI-generated items to human consumers.

It's also a bit frightening if, like me, you write for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable material based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we really indicate human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is photos. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were phony, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not believe using generative AI for imaginative purposes should be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without permission need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really effective but let's develop it fairly and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have picked to block AI developers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to utilize creators' material on the internet to help develop their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is likewise strongly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of happiness," states the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening among its finest carrying out markets on the unclear pledge of growth."

A federal government representative said: "No relocation will be made up until we are definitely positive we have a useful strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for best holders to help them accredit their material, access to high-quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for ideal holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI strategy, a national data library including public data from a large range of sources will likewise be provided to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the security of AI with, among other things, firms in the sector required to share information of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is stated to want the AI sector to face less policy.

This comes as a variety of suits versus AI companies, forum.altaycoins.com and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been secured by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and yogaasanas.science even a comedian.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the web without their consent, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of elements which can make up fair use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it gathers training data and whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being the many downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its technology for a fraction of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I truly desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weak point in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It is full of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite tough to read in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But provided how rapidly the tech is progressing, I'm not sure how long I can remain confident that my substantially slower human writing and modifying skills, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded to follow the biggest advancements in global innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters all over the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.